The Attorney General interjected requesting the Court to adjourn the matter for a few months. It was his submission that the Centre was in the process of formulating a data protection framework to regulate private entities collecting personal data.
For WhatsApp, it was argued that the service is popular only because of its insistence on privacy. It was submitted that no part of the content of any message was shared with any third party. The counsels for WhatsApp and Facebook also questioned the setting up of a constitution bench to hear this case as according to them, the case lacked a question of constitutional importance.
In the order passed by the Court today, this opposition to setting up a bench of five judges to hear the matter was recorded. However, Justice Mishra went on to state that this contention would be addressed at the time of the final verdict, signifying the Court’s intention to go ahead with the matter. The petitioners have been requested to file their propositions (/questions of law) by the 24th of April 2017. The case will be taken up for hearing again on the 27th of April 2017.
6 thoughts on “Supreme Court hears the WhatsApp-Facebook Data Sharing Case”
Pingback: WhatsApp-Facebook Data Sharing: Deadlock Over Issues | The CCG Blog
Pingback: WhatsApp-Facebook Data Sharing: Deadlock Over Issues - MediaNama
Pingback: Supreme Court of India hears the WhatsApp-Facebook Data Sharing Case - MediaNama
Pingback: (Updates from the SCOI) WhatsApp-Facebook Data Sharing (Day – I): From Content to Metadata | The CCG Blog
Is being White supremacist bad 910? Jew supremacy is openly practiced and called Zionism 760. The US government supports Jew supremacy so much they give over $50 BILLION a year to a Jew homeland. Should Whites not have a homeland paid for by US tax dollars, too? 471 https://blacksupremacist.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/left-wing-zionists-attack-the-police-in-minnesota-rally/
Pingback: The Whatsapp Privacy PIL: Did Facebook shoot Whatsapp in its foot? | SpicyIP