The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing a bunch of petitions, which will define the contours of Freedom of Expression over the Internet in India.
The Centre for Communication Governance at National Law University, Delhi has been tracking the case and is collecting various documents relating to it.
The details and other information regarding the cases is available below. (The table is not exhaustive as we are still collecting information)
If you have any information or copy of petitions or submissions please mail them to email@example.com
|Name of the Case||Case Number||Lawyer Appearing||Petition||Written submission|
|Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (U.O.I.)||W.P. (Crl.) No. 167/2012||Mr. Soli Sorabjee
Ms. Manali Singhal
Mr. Ninad Laud
Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi
Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh
|Available here||Available here|
|Common Cause (A Regd. Society) & Anr. v. U.O.I.||W.P. (C) No. 21/2013||Mr. Prashant Bhushan
Mr. Pranav Sachdeva
|Available here||Available here|
|Rajeev Chandrasekhar v. U.O.I. & Anr.||W.P. (C) No. 23/2013||Mr. Sajan Poovayya Mr. Priyadarshi Banerjee||Available here||Available here|
|Dilipkumar Tulsidas Shah v. U.O.I. & Anr.||W.P. (C) No. 97/2013|
|Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v. U.O.I. & Ors.||W.P. (Crl.) No. 199/2013||Mr. Sanjay Parikh Ms. Karuna Nundy Mr. Apar Gupta||Available here|
|Mouthshut.Com (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. U.O.I. & Ors.||W.P. (C) No. 217/2013||Mr. Shyam Divan
Ms. Mishi Choudhary
Ms. Shagun Belwal
Mr. Biju Nair
|Available here and the synopsis is available here|
|Taslima Nasrin v. State of U.P. & Ors.||W.P. (Crl.) No. 222/2013||Available here|
|Manoj Oswal v. U.O.I. & Anr.||W.P. (Crl.) No. 225/2013|
|Internet and Mobile Association of India & Anr. v. U.O.I. & Anr.||W.P. (C) No. 758/2014||Mr. KK Venugopal
Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal
Mr. J. Sai Deepak
|Anoop M.K. v. U.O.I. & Ors.||W.P. (Crl.) No. 196/2014||Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayan
Ms. Lakshmi Kaimal
Mr. Vikramaditya Jha
Update on hearing
The final hearing in the matter is being heard by a Supreme Court bench of Justices J. Chelameswar and SA Bobde.
On the first day of the hearing (December 9, 2014) Mr. Soli Sorabjee completed his arguments on Section 66A of the IT Act in Shreya Singhal v. UOI and Mr. Prasanth Bhushan on Section 66A, 69A and 80 of the IT Act in Common Cause v. UOI. Mr. Sanjay Parikh started his arguments on behalf of PUCL in PUCL v UOI.
On the second day of the hearing (December 10, 2014) Mr. Parikh completed his arguments on Section 66A of the IT Act and Mr. Sajan Poovayya also on Section 66A of the IT Act in Rajeev Chandrasekhar. Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayan representing Anoop MK in Anoop MK v UOI has started his arguments of Section 66A and Section 69A.
The court had initially stated that it will hear the arguments on the statutory provisions (Sections 66A, 69A, 79 and 80) before coming to the delegated legislations, however today the Court agreed to hear the arguments on Section 79 and the rules framed under it together. However, the arguments on Rules framed under Section 69A will be taken up separately.
Over the next few days we will provide a detailed summary of the final hearings in the case
2 thoughts on “Cases that will define the contours of Free Speech over the Internet in India”
Pingback: Notes of Proceedings- I: Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, W.P. (Crl.) No. 167/2012 | Centre for Communication Governance
Pingback: Terms under 66A open ended: Supreme Court | Centre for Communication Governance